Synergy - Project SOLID and SAFEnetwork

I think it will be useful both to have a mechanism such as the one you refer to here, and the ability for RDF resources to be accessed by the browser as if they are a Web service. The former will allow linking directly to Immutable Data, and more general forms of file sharing without using a public ID, so will be very valuable. The latter may prove useful in itself, because a short readable URI is a better UI, and can be updated for example, and is available now.

In the DevCon demo you can see me doing the second kind, but I hacked it by making an LDP based on top a SAFE www device, rather than a separate new LDP SAFE service type - which is necessary if we want to generalise this. I made a proposal for how to do that here:

Where files are stored using NFS we can use the file extension to imply the ContentType (which is how a typical Solid server works), but if the SAFE NFS API is extended to allow this to be set as metadata, we could use that instead.

I’m not sure how important that is for ContentType because using the file extension works well enough, but I think it’s still going to be useful to allow NFS file metadata to be set, and I believe this is already planned.

At the same time I’d like to add the option to have MD entries for containers so they can also have metadata, and can also be explicitly created and deleted, because this improves compatibility with LDP and therefore Solid.

Thanks for your input and please keep digging in, it’s great to see. I am due to chat with @Viv and @Krishna about going forward so tagging them with your interest.

7 Likes